Bleacher Banter – Adam Dunn
Posted Under: Archive - Howard, Archive - Other, Fantasy Advice
There are certain topics that we geeks go back and forth on. What’s better than arguing with a friend about baseball players and their fantasy value for hours at a time? Well, this one, and many more to come, we’re taking public. Howard and I have been “discussing” the fantasy value of Adam Dunn. We are both going to give you a short version of our arguements, and then let your comments decide who is right. Settle this for us, huh?
Keith:

40 HR, but not much else for a high price
Adam Dunn is an overrated fantasy commodity. It is easy to say that 40 HR and 100RBI are a lock, but there is more to this puzzle. His runs scored have been right around 100 traditionally, but last year saw a drastic drop. With his new team, that number is not only unlikely to rebound, but his other numbers should suffer as well. The Nationals scored the 3rd lowest amount of runs in 2008 (missing last place by 4 runs). His speed dropped off last year as well. We haven’t even gotten to the batting average portion of his problem. A .235 average is terrible. This isn’t something that you can just dismiss. That is at least .040 below what an mid-level fantasy team’s BA should be (let alone a good team). To draft him is to take the 550 ABs your best hitter gives you at about .310 and turns it into a mediocre .275. That costs you points! He is a two category asset when all this is considered. For the price I would have to pay to get him, I would rather get someone that helps in 4 categories, and use the extra money for another need.

Not only do chicks dig the longball, but it wins championships
Howard:
Oh come on now! Somebody help me here! 40 bombs, man! 40 bombs each year for the last 5 years! You just can’t deny that, nor can you hardly find anyone else these days to do that. There were two guys last year that hit 40 or more home runs and one of them was Adam Dunn. Yes, the batting average sucks — no question. But you can easily work around that. If you’re planning on drafting Dunn and his, as my good ol’ Uncle Mike likes to say, “country strong” power, you’re not grabbing him in the top 3 rounds are you? No way. Of course not. So use those picks to build up your other positions with high average guys. It’s as simple as that. If your first 2 picks are guys who hit over .300 and get roughly 550 AB each , then you’re set. Sure, you won’t lead your league in BA, but you don’t need to finish first in average to win a roto championship and you certainly don’t need to always win it in head to head match-ups. But you do need power to win the overall and Dunn has plenty. So why not get a leg up on HR and RBI and draft one guy that does the work of two? You’ll be ahead of the game. Don’t sweat the batting average so much. It’s one category. Speed? You’re not drafting this guy for speed. Any swipe you get is a bonus. But it should also be noted that he’s averaged half a dozen SB over the last 3 seasons. And if you need a third category to increase his appeal, don’t worry. The runs scored will come. He’s got solid young hitters behind him in Ryan Zimmerman and Elijah Dukes so when he gets on base with that delicious .381 career OBP, someone will be there to knock him home. Trust me — grab Dunn at the right moment in your draft and you’ll be laughing all the way to the top of your standings. Now someone go get Keith a knife and fork, cuz he just got served!





Reader Comments
“grab Dunn at the right moment in your draft”.. is the KEY phrase here. Probably just around pick 100.. same time as Carlos Pena but before Pat Burrell. Similar issues…power, not much else. Any earlier, Keith is right. Wasted pick. Any later, Howard is right.. value pick.
Not a fan of Dunn but his numbers might not be terrible in Washington. The NAts are not a good team but they do have some talent on the roster, specifically Milledge and Dukes if they stay healthy. Dunn might have a few RBI chances and even runs scored chances as he may see in an increase in walks or even have a few situations where he has runners in scoring position. Again, not advocating taking him just saying he may not be as awful as everyone thinks.
Did someone just refer to Adam Dunn’s speed numbers? His triples went from 2 to 0!!!! Dunn has never been on a good team. I don’t believe they finished above 500 in any of his 40 HR years. That is likely why his 40 homeruns BARELY have translated to 100 RBI in the past (or less than 100 in 2006). If there is any real concern it should be driven by him not getting half his ABs in Cinci, though the obvious response to that is during his streak there hasn’t seemed to be a big difference for him hitting HRs home and away (25/21 was I think the biggest split). If you are drafting Dunn for power and power only in a fantasy league, he’s been about as consistent as you can get. If you are hoping he is going to bring home the speed numbers… you’re doing it wrong.
I used to own Dunn in my keeper league 3 years ago and let him go because I was caught up in his average too. Now I wish I still had him.
There were 92 major leaguers who hit 20 or more home runs last year so there’s power to be had all over the place. If your opponents are grabbing it, then so are you. It’s not like you’re bypassing guys in the draft because you have too much power, are you? So isn’t having Dunn that much more of a bonus?
There are plenty of options out there to help you in batting average but like Howard said, there are only 2 guys who hit 40+ HR. It’s definitely an advantage having a huge masher like that.
Unless of course your league penalizes for strikeouts.
The key factor in this arguement is price compared to production. The money you spend on those 40 HRs could be much better used with a little research.
I dunno, man.
Sounds like our readers know what’s going down on the street. The power is essential and the smart and savvy owners know when to take him and how to make him work for you.